Henry the Young King and the Clergy
As Ralph of Diceto noted in his Images of History ‘Richard bishop of London died on 5 May
[1162]' (p.108). I thought it worth using the occasion to post about Henry the
Young King and his relations with the clergy*
Richard de Belmeis II, bishop ofLondon
Henry ofPisa ** and William of Pavia
Thomas Becket, Archbishop ofCanterbury
Thomas Becket again…
Gerald, Bishop of Cahors and Bernard, Bishop of Agen
* I am not going to discuss Henry’s chaplains. I will write about them in the second part of Who’s Who, since I think they belong more to Henry’s household and should be mentioned together with other young king’s officials.
Richard de Belmeis II, bishop of
Richard de
Belmeis II, bishop of London (1152-1162), former canon and archdeacon of
Middlesex and nephew of the former bishop, Richard de Belmeis I appointed in
1108 by Henry I was the bishop, who baptized the young king. The London see and chapter
were occupied by a Belmeis- Foliot dynasty (famous Gilbert Foliot was also
related to the Belmeis clan) for a large part of the twelfth century (1108-1127
and 1152-1187).
Henry of
Since 1156- the
year of his elder brother, William’s death- Prince Henry had been his father’s
sole heir. In 1158, thanks to the successful mission of the then chancellor,
Thomas Becket, he had been betrothed to Marguerite, the third daughter of Louis
VII of France .
When in 1160 Louis’s second wife, Constance of Castile died in childbirth and
he was left with but four daughters, the French king panicked, “did not observe
the proper time of mourning” and married his third wife, Adela of Blois
unseemly shortly afterwards. This unusually resolute move by usually monkish
Louis caught Henry II somehow off balance, but with his usual decisiveness he acted
immediately. Taking advantage of the presence of the papal legates at his
court, he arranged the marriage almost on the spot. Henry of Pisa and William
of Pavia were the emissaries of Alexander III (c. 1100/1105 – 1181), who
sought Henry II’s support in his conflict with the antipope Victor IV. The
legates were eager to be of service and the marriage of five-year-old Henry and two-year-old
Marguerite- who “were as yet but little children crying in their cradle”
(Howden)- was celebrated at Newbourg on the 2nd of November
[1160]. And although the English king’s plan to see his son and heir on the
French throne one day- after all Louis had no male successor- was shattered,
Marguerite’s dowry, the Norman Vexin was now secured in the Plantagenets’ hold.
The Young King refuses to meet Thomas Becket. Chartres, Cathédrale Notre-Dame, window 18, panel 18.
Rotrou,
Archbishop of Rouen
In 1162 Rotrou, Archbishop of
Rouen (1109-1183/4) had a letter of
polite reproach formulated and written by Peter of Blois. The addressee was the
king of England
himself and the writ concerned the king’s
eldest son and heir. ‘Although other kings are of a rude and
uncultivated character, yours, which was formed by literature, is prudent in
the administration of great affairs, subtle in judgments, and circumspect in
counsel. Wherefore all your bishops unanimously agree that Henry, your son and
heir may be the successor to your wisdom as well as to your kingdom’. (in
Meade, p.251).
The
Archbishop was growing more and more anxious. Henry was seven years old and
already a married man, still he lived with his mother. Something quite
unthinkable, not to say shocking, by the twelfth century standards. Either
Rotrou’s letter bore fruit or- which I find more probable- Henry II simply
followed his family tradition of a good education and consequently had his
golden boy placed in the household of his chancellor and friend, Thomas Becket. Rotrou was to play an
important role in Henry’s life once again, this time ten years later, in 1172.
He was the one who, together with Gilles, bishop of Evreux, and Roger, bishop of Worcester, presided over the Young King’s second coronation in
the church of Saint Swithin, at Winchester, ‘on the sixth day before the
calends of September, being the Lord’s Day [27
August]’.
Thomas Becket, Archbishop of
According
to William Fitz Stephen Henry II was not the first to choose Becket
(c.1118-1170) as his son’s tutor: “…magnates of the kingdom of England and of neighboring kingdoms placed
their children in the chancellor’s service, and he grounded them in honest
education and doctrine… The king himself, his lord, commended his son, the heir
to the kingdom, to his training, and the chancellor kept him with him among the
many nobles’ sons of similar age, and their appropriate attendants, masters and
servants according to rank.” At the behest of the king Becket took his young
ward across the Narrow Sea to England in early May 1162. He was to call the
Great Council in the king’s name and prepare the prince for his recognition by
the bishops and magnates of the realm. It was there, at London ,
where young Henry was presented with the petition that his freshly-assigned
tutor should be appointed as archbishop and asked to give a formal consent to
it. On 3 June he witnessed Becket’s consecration at Canterbury . What he must have witnessed too
was his tutor’s almost day-to-day transformation from the worldly chancellor
into a monk exercising both his flesh and soul. With ‘a hairshirt of the
roughest kind, which reached to his knees and swarmed with vermin’ and with the
mortification ‘of his flesh with the sparest diet’ came other changes in the
former chancellor: “… the glorious Archbishop
Thomas, contrary to the expectation of the king and everyone else, so utterly
abandoned the world and so suddenly experienced that conversion, which is God’s
handiwork, that all men marveled thereat.”
(in the Plantagenet Chronicles, p.109) The one who
marveled most must have been king Henry II himself. What his eldest son thought
about Becket’s conversion, we will never learn. But this sudden day-to-day
change in his worldly tutor must have taken him by surprise. The Archbishop chose
to oppose young Henry’s father in all matters, both of lesser and crucial
importance. To show his ever-growing displeasure towards his former chancellor
and friend, Henry II had his son removed from Becket’s household. The short
time spent in Becket’s tutelage (c. May 1162- October 1163) proved to be enough
to left the boy with his head full of visions of splendor and grandeur, visions
quite different from those nourished by his father, the king. Those who regard
and regarded the Young King as a ‘charming, vain, idle spendthrift’ (Warren ) should look for
the origins of his taste for glamour, luxury and greatness underneath the roof
of his tutor, Thomas Becket. As Professor Matthew Strickland points out ‘the
experience must have made a profound impression upon the boy’, and not only the
splendor of the household itself or the chancellor’s worldly ways, but also
Becket’s own aspiring to perform a model knightly prowess and valor. Young
Henry, aged four, had seen Becket leaving Poitiers at the head of seven hundred knights
in the course of Henry II’s Toulouse Campaign, in 1159. While accompanying the
chancellor to Normandy in 1161, he may have witnessed the
latter defeat the French knight Enguerrand de Trie in single combat. Finally,
being Becket’s ward he had a chance to admire his tutor’s military household
and see for himself, the chancellor’s knights ‘in all the army of the king of
England… always first, always the most daring, always performed excellently’.
Henry’s later displays of largesse and greatness, his prowess on the tournament
field, his own splendid household may all be a consequence of his stay in
Becket’s tutelage.
Roger of
Pont-l’Eveque, archbishop of York
Roger of Pont l’Eveque
(c.1115-1181), Archbishop of York, by some called "a learned and
eloquent man, and in worldly affairs, prudent almost to singularity” by others
simply a "devil”, was the man who in 1170, acting at Henry II’s order, crowned
Young Henry king of England in Westminster Abbey, in the absence of the exiled
Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. The coronation enraged Thomas Becket
and renewed the long-lasting dispute over primacy between Canterbury
and York . The Archbishop of Canterbury reminded
that it was the traditional right of the archbishop of Canterbury ,
and not the archbishop of York , to perform
coronations. In his turn, Archbishop Roger evoked Pope Gregory the Great’s
words “Let there be between the bishops of London and York distinction of
honour according to seniority of ordination”, and explained that in 1161 he
received a letter in which His Holiness, the Pope permitted the King of England
to have his son, Henry crowned by any bishop of his choosing. Roger was well
acquainted with Thomas: the two had been members of the household of Archbishop
Theobald of Canterbury , before acquiring even more
honourable positions. When Becket went to exile in 1164, it was Roger who acted
as the senior churchman in England ,
the situation which, on 14 June 1170, lead him straight to Westminster Abbey
and the young prince awaiting to be crowned. The act that he was to pay for
dearly. The coronation was considered illegal and Roger and the
bishops who assisted him*** at the ceremony excommunicated. Furthermore
the coronation enraged Louis VII of France , since his daughter
Marguerite, the younger Henry’s wife, for reasons that remain obscure was not
crowned with her husband. To placate Louis VII and mend the rift between them,
and because the first coronation of his son was considered invalid, Young
Henry’s father, outdid himself in organizing the most elaborate and grand
ceremony, that took place on 27 August 1172 at Winchester, with Rotrou,
archbishop of Rouen officiating. The Princess’s father had expressed the wish
that the excommunicated bishops who performed the coronation of his son-in-law
in 1170 had been forbidden to participate. Roger
was later able to return to his duties, but with the war already lost: Canterbury now had her freshly canonized martyr,
Thomas of blessed memory.
Thomas Becket again…
As a result of the cooperation of the pope and
the king of France ,
Henry II and Thomas Becket finally came to terms, with the former willing to
grant all that was demanded of him in order to avoid his continental domains
being laid under interdict. The reconciliation took place on 22 July 1170 at
Freteval. Thomas Becket was promised a safe passage to England and return to Canterbury . Shortly before he crossed the
Channel, the archbishop, doubtful of the king’s good intentions, sent ahead the
letters excommunicating the prelates who had participated in the illegal
coronation of the Young King, namely the archbishop of York
and the bishops of London and Salisbury . On 8/9
December 1170, a
week after his return to England and to Canterbury, Thomas Becket set off for Winchester, by way of London, to pay respects to his
one-time ward and new king, Young Henry. Knowing the latter’s love for horses,
Thomas ‘brought with him three costly chargers, of wondrous speed, beautiful in
form, high-stepping, their delicate flanks rippling as they walked, their
housing worked with flowers in various colours, which he intended to give as a
gift to his new lord.’ (William fitz Stephen in Meade, p.313-14) Shortly before
he set off, Thomas sent Richard of Dover ahead to announce his arrival. When
already in Winchester , Richard was met with a cool
reception. The fifteen-year-old king’s guardians, officials and courtiers were
mostly hostile to the Archbishop and took care to reduce the access to their
young lord. Thus the archbishop managed to travel only as far as London when he was halted by a messenger from
the Young King. Henry refused to meet his one-time tutor and forbade him to
continue the progress. Thomas was to return to Canterbury
immediately. In the meantime the three excommunicated bishops hurried to
Normandy ,
straight to king Henry’s Christmas court. On learning what happened Henry burst
out with one of his famous uncontrolled rages. ‘Will nobody rid me of this
low-born priest?!’ he was to shout. Four days later, on Tuesday, 29 December,
Thomas Becket was murdered in his own Cathedral by four Henry’s knights. Upon
learning of Thomas’s death the Young King was to remark: 'What a pity! But Thank God it was kept
a secret from me and that no liege-man of mine was involved in it!' I suppose that, over the years, he must have
grown indifferent to his one-time tutor.
John aux Bellesmains, Bishop of Poitiers ****
John,
born in 1127, was a member of Archbishop Theobald [of Canterbury ]’s
household, a close friend of John of Salisbury and a correspondent of both Salisbury and Ralph of
Diceto. In the years 1154-1162 he was a treasurer of York ;
from 1162 to 1182 bishop of Poitiers , and later,
successively, arcbishop of Narbonne (1182-83),
and Lyons
(1183-93). He retired to Clairvaux, where he died in 1204. In 1176 John, the
then bishop of Poitiers ,
was taken by surprise and forced to complete a very ungrateful mission. The
news reached him that the Young King was planning to sentence his
vice-chancellor, Adam to death. The wretch had been caught while trying to send
a letter to Henry’s father- ‘as he owed everything to the lord king [Henry II]
who had found him a place with his son’- in which he informed of all what he
had witnessed at his lord’s court. The writ discovered, the action enraged
Young Henry, who, in the aftermath of the Great Revolt (1173-74), had his
household filled with his father’s men and felt constrained, and he tried Adam
for his life. It was only thanks to the intervention of bishop John that Adam
was saved, although that did not mean he avoided punishment. And it turned out
to be a humiliating one: the chancellor was whipped naked through the streets
of Argentan and later imprisoned. Henry II himself intervened on his behalf and
had him placed in Hyde abbey at Winchester .
Bishop John saved Adam’s neck protesting that the vice-chancellor was a clerk
and, thus, should not be subject to lay jurisdiction.
Gerald, Bishop of Cahors and Bernard, Bishop of Agen
Both
bishops were present at Henry’s deathbed. On 7 June 1183, when it was
already clear that the Young King was not going to survive, he prostrated
himself naked on the floor, and before the crucifix confessed his sins to
Gerald, Bishop of Cahors. On 11 June, surrounded by
churchmen, with Bernard, Bishop of
Agen administering the last rites, he confessed again, first privately, then in
public. As death drew near he had a hair shirt put on him and asked to be dragged out of bed
by a noose wound round his neck. ‘By this cord,’ he said,
‘do I deliver myself, an unworthy, culpable, and guilty sinner, unto you, the
ministers of God, beseeching that our Lord Jesus Christ, who remitted his sins
to the thief when confessing upon the cross, will, through your prayers, and
through his ineffable mercy, have compassion upon my most wretched soul!’
* I am not going to discuss Henry’s chaplains. I will write about them in the second part of Who’s Who, since I think they belong more to Henry’s household and should be mentioned together with other young king’s officials.
** In 1162 Cardinal Henry of Pisa baptized Young Henry’s sister, Eleanor.
*** Four English bishops assisted at the ceremony.
These were Hugh of Durham, Gilbert of London, Jocelyn of Salisbury and Walter
of Rochester. The Norman bishops present were Henry of Bayeux and Giles of
Evreux.
**** In
1172 John, then the bishop of Poitiers played an
important role in the ceremony in which the young Richard [the Lionheart] ,
Henry’s brother became duke of Aquitaine .
Thanks to Geoffrey of Vigeois we know that, together with bishop Bertram of
Bordeaux, John offered Richard a lance with a banner. In 1178,
together with other high officials of the Church, John stood at the head of the
anti-heresy mission sent to Toulouse
by Henry II and Louis VII.
Sources:
Roger of Wendover’s Flowers of History Vol. II translated by J. A. Giles, Google
Books.
Images of History by Ralph of Diceto in The Plantagenet Chronicles ed. by Dr Elizabeth
Hallam. Greenwich
Edition, 2002.
The Annals of Roger of Howden. Vol I. Trans. by Henry T. Riley. Internet Archive of Northeastern University
Libraries
William
Fitz Stephen on Thomas Becket in The Plantagenet Chronicles ed. by Dr Elizabeth
Hallam. Greenwich
Edition, 2002.
“On the Instruction of a
Prince: the Upbringing of Henry, the Young King” by Matthew Strickland in Henry II: New Interpretations. Ed.
Christopher Harper-Bill and Nicholas Vincent. Woodbridge , 2007.
William
Marshal. Court Career and Chivalry in
the Angevin Empire 1147-1219 by
David Crouch. Harlow , 1990.
Death
of Kings: Royal Death in Medieval England by Michael Evans. London , 2007.
Bishop and Chapter in Twelfth-Century England by Everett U. Crosby . Google
Books.
Franks, Burgundians,
and Aquitanians and the Royal Coronation Ceremony in France by Elizabeth A. R. Brown, Google
books.
“Anglo-Norman Names Recorded
in the Durham Liber Vitae” by John S.
Moore in The Durham Liber Vitae and its
Context ed.by D. Rollason, A.J. Piper, M.Harvey and L. Rollason, Google
Books.
Eleanor of Aquitaine by Marion Meade.
Pheonix Press Paperback, 2002
The World of Eleanor of Aquitaine . Literature
and Society in Southern
France between the
Eleventh and Thirteenth Centuries ed.
by Marcus Bull and Catherine Leglu. The Boydell Press, 2005.
Henry II by W. L. Warren.
Google Books.
Interesting to think that some of the Young King's faults might be laid at the door of Beckett. And yes, Henry must have been amazed at the transformation of his former tutor.
ReplyDeleteWell, I'm not sure whether they can be called faults. Some of them, such as Henry's extravagance, yes! Certainly. But I would rather say- I know you're going to find me partial- the young king and the old king held different views on kingship in general. In this matter the son followed the tradition fostered in his mother's homeland, Aquitaine, with his forefathers' love for luxury and splendour. Henry's stay in Becket's tutelage only added to something that had already run in his veins :-)
ReplyDeleteThat's so interesting, I'd never heard Young Henry's reaction to Becket's death before!
ReplyDeleteA little bit indifferent, I know! But Thomas Becket must have been a difficult man to like, at least after his conversion.
ReplyDelete