Skip to main content

7 June 1183: 'Have Compassion upon My Most Wretched Soul!’

In the opening months of 1183 Henry was busily occupied with wresting control of the Duchy of Aquitaine from his younger brother Richard. With Geoffrey, Duke of Brittany, another younger brother, and an ardent support of Poitevan barons discontent with Richard’s iron rule, the Young King was desperate to win a portion of the family domains for himself. He stood in opposition not only to Richard, who at that time was facing a formidable French-Burgundian-Toulousain coalition backing up the Young King, but also to his father king Henry II of England, who hastened to Richard’s rescue. It was the second time that Henry took up arms against his father, the King. The underlying cause of this revolt was the same as in 1173: he did not want to be a king only in name. In 1170 his father had him crowned a king-associate of England, but in reality, the Young King had no land of his own and no power to rule, the great number of his charters from that period being only either homologues or confirmations of his father’s charters, and his household consisting of the officials of his father’s choosing. In fact, his younger brothers, Richard, Duke of Aquitaine and Geoffrey, Duke of Brittany enjoyed more real power than he, the eldest one. Thus, in taking over Aquitaine, Richard’s maternal inheritance, the Young King saw his chance of gaining real authority and financial independence. With his mighty allies he might have achieved this very goal had he not contracted bloody flux (dysentery). On 26 May, in the town of Uzerche, he suffered from - as it may seem - the first bout of illness, but he quickly came to himself. In fact he was well enough to pillage the shrine of St Amadour at Rocamadour. 

                                                          Rocamadour today (photo: Patrick Clenet)

Together with the booty he carried off a sword which was said to be Durendal, the weapon of the legendary hero, Roland. There were precious relics in its hilt: the tooth of St Peter, the blood of St Basil, hair of St Denis and a piece of the robe of the Blessed Virgin. As Emma Mason points out in "The Hero's Invincible Weapon: an Aspect of Angevin Propaganda”: 'If the Young King accepted that his booty was indeed the Durendal of Roland, then he would believe himself to be under the protection of these powerful relics. Perhaps perceiving himself as a hero-figure in his contest against his father, he might prize an object which would be widely recognized as an emotive symbol... In his looting of Rocamadour, the Young King was perhaps seeking not only material reinforcement, but also the means of projecting a charismatic image' (pp. 126-127). Looting itself certainly could not have helped him, but the sword of Roland could. Richard often employed the projection of a heroic image as a part of his military tactics. As it turned out, however, Durendal proved to be useless in protecting Henry against more dangerous foe, whose severe and full-scale attack launched from within proved fatal. Dysentery was the curse of the medieval warfare, wrecking havoc and taking its toll in the military camps. On Tuesday, the 7th of June, it was clear that the Young King was not going to survive. One can only try to imagine what scenes accompanied breaking of this sad news - Henry's household knights must have been utterly distraught. I completely disagree with the author Sharon Kay Penman, who in the King's Ransom - the novel about Henry's brother Richard I Couer de Lion - says that neither Henry II nor Henry the Young King inspired such loyalty from their men as Richard did. It is enough to read about their last hours to see they had a few absolutely loyal men with them.

                                        
                Maison Fabri, Martel, where Henry the Young King spent the last days of his life.

But back to the little town of Martel, Limousin, deep in the south of Aquitaine, where Henry just realised it was time to say "Farewell" and prepare himself to face the Maker. Taking into account the working of the twelfth-century mind, he must have believed himself a condemned criminal, and his illness a divine punishment, especially if he was the sole victim of the malady (I was unable to determine if there were others in Henry's household and troops who succumbed to it as well at the time). For this reason he sought rescue in all possible ways of repentance. After all, he had not only betrayed his father, but also pillaged the most sacred shrines in Western France (St Martial near Limoges, Grandmont and St Amadour at Rocamadour). To make amends and to show how he regretted, he prostrated himself naked on the floor, and before the crucifix confessed his sins to Gerald, Bishop of Cahors. As death drew near he had a hair shirt put on him and asked to be dragged out of bed by a noose wound round his neck. ‘By this cord,’ he was to say, ‘do I deliver myself, an unworthy, culpable, and guilty sinner, unto you, the ministers of God, beseeching that our Lord Jesus Christ, who remitted his sins to the thief when confessing upon the cross, will, through your prayers, and through his ineffable mercy, have compassion upon my most wretched soul!’ According to his wishes, he was then placed on a bed of ashes on the floor, with stones under his head and his feet, ‘in the manner which St Martin prescribed for monks’. He still had four days to live.


A detailed account of Henry's unfortunate campaign on 11 June.

Comments

  1. A very moving story - and vividly told, as usual. Thanks for another great post about The Forgotten King, Kasia. I look forward to the campaign post! There'll be lots of great detail for anecdotes to use in my future live-talks about Henry's mum - Eleanor. Or just for me to enjoy reading! :-)

    Best, Ulrik

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Ulrik! You are very kind :-) I wish I could listen to your talk on Eleanor one day...

      Delete
    2. I have plans to make an online version of some sort, so maybe ... :-)

      Delete
    3. Sounds fantastic! Please let me know when it's ready, Ulrik! I am looking forward to it :-)

      Delete
  2. And yet in Penman's novel, as the Young King realises he is dying, his knights and household are shown as being absolutely devastated, as they naturally would have been. Young Henry had been full of life and an example of the chivalric code with his taking part in tournaments. His followers must have been looking forward to a glittering reign - he promised so much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I cannot understand it, Anerje. Sharon Kay Penman's portrayal of the Young King is the best and "the fullest", if I can use the word :-) One can learn Henry's bio from her Devil's Brood. And yet what she says about Henry in her blog posts stands in stark contrast to her Hal from the novel. She doesn't hold him in high esteem. I wonder how she could show him so much uderstanding only to direct such harsh criticism at him later.

      Delete
  3. Sorry I am late in seeing this. Wonderful post. xx Shared on fb. Hope you are doing well. x

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words and sharing, dear Marsha :-) As always much appreciated. I'm fine, thank you. I promise to e-mail you ASAP.

      Delete
  4. Kasia, thank you for this well-written post, reminding us again not only of the young King's tragedy, but also the mindset at the time. We can't imagine today the horrific anguish of believing an eternity of Hell awaited you. Well, I'll qualify that. We were plagued with that horror as kids growing up in a very medieval religious system, Catholic of course. And that wasn't very long ago! Oh what freedom when we renounced the whole kit & kaboodle! I have great sympathy for all that psychological torture in the MA.

    Ciao, Joan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Joan. I am happy you enjoyed it. Heaven and hell, salvation and damnation were very real at the time, weren't they? It must have been - as you put it - psychological torture plus quite useful weapon to manipulate poor sinners.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great blog post!!! its worth to read this. I found out some more great stuff to read.
    web design

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unfortunately, I was forced to delete Anderson Joey's comment. It had nothing to do with the Young King - just advertising. I think I will have not other choice but to improve this blog's security system :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The History of William Marshal on the War of 1183. Part I

The anniversary of Henry the Young King's untimely passing is fast approaching and though I have discussed the surrounding events many times here, on the blog, I have never focused solely on the version introduced by one John, the author of the History of William Marshal. If we are believe to him, this is what happened in the spring of 1183 and these are the roots of the conflict that broke out between the Angevins, the conflict in which brothers stood against each other, and sons stood against father (following the translation by Nigel Bryant):

'(...) the following Lent saw conflict between the three brothers. The Young King and his brother Count Geoffrey, lord of Brittany, angrily left their father, offended and enraged that their brother, the count of Poitiers, with their father's backing, had made so bold as to wage war on the highest nobles of that land and to treat them most unjustly. They'd complained to the Young King and declared that they would sooner serve hi…

Safe Passage to Heaven

Saturday, 11 June 1183. Martel. The spring in the valley of the Dordogne lazily drifts into summer. A young man, with a sapphire ring fervently pressed to his lips, lies dying in the house of Etienne Fabri’s. He finds himself far from his family, among ‘quite barbarous people’ in Gascony, with only a few faithful companions at his side. That young man happens to be the King of England’s son and heir. Contemporary chroniclers refer to him either as Young Henry, Henry the Younger, the Young King or Henry III. He does not know that since he is destined to predecease his father, his name will vanish somewhere in a dim and distant… future, almost utterly lost to posterity. Ironically, it is Henry’s untimely passing-the best documented moment of his life-that he is mainly remembered for. Additionally, the actions surrounding his death serve as an invaluable source of information concerning the rituals performed at the twelfth-century deathbed. From his example we can learn a lot about medie…

A Few Facts About Henry the Young King

Henry the Young King was the only king of England crowned in his father’s lifetime. In this his father, Henry II followed the continental tradition. The Capetian rulers had their heirs crowned during their reign in order to avoid even a momentary interregnum and disorder. Louis VI, for instance, still active monarch, had his son, also Louis, anointed in Rheims cathedral already in 1131. It was not until 1137 that Louis began his independent rule and only upon his father’s death. The same Louis had his only son, Philip crowned in 1179, a year before he himself died. Today I would like to introduce a few facts about Henry the Young King everyone should know.
- Henry (b. 28 February 1155) was not meant to be a king. The crown was to be inherited by his elder brother, William (b.17 August 1153). Unfortunately, at the age of three, William became seriously ill and died, the only child of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, who failed to reach maturity. Upon his untimely passing, Henry, the s…