Skip to main content

26 May 1183: Uzerche and Caen or the Sad End Is Nigh

As we know, in the spring of 1183 Henry the Young King was leading military campaign against his younger brother Richard [later Lionheart] and his father, Henry II, treading the path that was to be his last. On 26 May he was in the town of Uzerche, suffering from - as it may seem - the first bout of illness which was to kill him seventeen days later. He quickly came to himself, though, and joined forces with Hugh of Burgundy and Raymond V of Tolouse, his much-awaited allies. He could not have known that at the same time, far in the north, at Caen, the archbishop of Canterbury and the bishops of Bayeux, Evreux, Lisieux, Sees and Rochester, acting on his father’s orders, excommunicated all who “impeded the making of peace between the king and his sons”. All with the exception of the Young King. Although Henry himself avoided the severe punishment, he must have been in a poor mental and physical condition, as we can read in between the lines of Roger of Hoveden's account. 

Abbey church of St Peter and St Andrew at Uzerche (photo by Sjwells53, via Wikipedia)

Currently I am working on a longer post about Henry and his brother Geoffrey of Brittany's actions taken in the course of the afore-mentioned 1183 campaign. I am following the two of them into this terra indomita, Aquitaine, analysing their moves, step by step. I hope the post will be ready for the 7th of June, four days before the anniversary of Henry's untimely death. Using the occasion I would like to recommend a fascinating article by Professor John Gillingham, entitled "Events and Opinions: Norman & English Views on Aquitaine" in The World of Eleanor of Aquitaine. Literature and Society in Southern France between the Eleventh and  Thirteenth Centuries ed. by Marcus Bull and Catherine Leglu (The Boydell Press, 2005).  

There is one more recommendation to be made (although this author's posts need no advertising). At the Mortimer Society Conference Ms Elizabeth Chadwick gave a paper she is now sharing on her blog. The complex relationship between William Marshal and Henry's youngest brother King John is discussed in detail in it. Fascinating read. Henry and John's relationship is mentioned as well, so it is really worth reading.


  1. Poor Henry's illness dragged on for some time. Looking forward to your future posts:) Yes, John had a number of illegitimate children - Richard, it seems, also had a couple - I shall await your future posts to let me know if Young Henry or Geoffrey had any. I will check out the post on John and William Marshal - should make for interesting reading!

    1. Richard had one (I mean the one we know about) - Philip of Cognac. As for Henry and Geoffrey - there are no records of their illegitimate children. I have a few theories of my own. One of them says: Henry and Geoffrey, of all Henry and Eleanor's sons were the biggest fans of tournament (Richard preferred waging real wars) so perhaps followers of the "chivalric" code (chivalry itseldf is a later term, but the set of values must have been pretty much the same already in the 12th century). Plus they might have been disgusted at their father's behaviour - Henry II was in his forties when he took the young Ida de Tosney for his mistress and sired William Longespée, so he continued with his out of wedlock habits, whereas his rightful wife, his legitimate sons' mother, was kept in close confinement on his orders. Just speculating :-) As for the young king himself, I have an additional separate theory as well, but will leave it for the future post :-)

  2. Fabulous post, dear Kasia. Looking forward to your detailed account. Shared on fb. Elizabeth's lecture was brilliant. Loved it. xx

    1. Thank you, Marsha! Yes, the lecture was superb. I wish I could be there to listen to Elizabeth in person :-)

  3. Interesting theory Kasia. I look forward to more on the Young King:)

  4. Hmm, now I'm interested in hearing your separate theory on the young king! Will read Ms Chadwick's paper. You always include such interesting & important extras in your posts.

    Thanks Kasia,

  5. Now, that I am thinking about it, I shouldn't have written that Richard "preferred waging real wars", but that he had no choice but to wage them. Let us not forget about his unruly barons, the whole army of Bertrans de Born, as I like to call them :-) They were real troublemakers. On the other hand, Richard's ruling style was "the iron fist" so little wonder they rebelled against him time after time, drawing Henry and Geoffrey to their cause in 1182/83. Not that the latter two were innocent lambs, far from that :-D More in my upcoming post.

  6. I suspect innocent lambs could not even be found in monasteries in those times. At least not if they belonged to a family of birth and power. ;-)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The History of William Marshal on the War of 1183. Part I

The anniversary of Henry the Young King's untimely passing is fast approaching and though I have discussed the surrounding events many times here, on the blog, I have never focused solely on the version introduced by one John, the author of the History of William Marshal. If we are believe to him, this is what happened in the spring of 1183 and these are the roots of the conflict that broke out between the Angevins, the conflict in which brothers stood against each other, and sons stood against father (following the translation by Nigel Bryant):

'(...) the following Lent saw conflict between the three brothers. The Young King and his brother Count Geoffrey, lord of Brittany, angrily left their father, offended and enraged that their brother, the count of Poitiers, with their father's backing, had made so bold as to wage war on the highest nobles of that land and to treat them most unjustly. They'd complained to the Young King and declared that they would sooner serve hi…

Safe Passage to Heaven

Saturday, 11 June 1183. Martel. The spring in the valley of the Dordogne lazily drifts into summer. A young man, with a sapphire ring fervently pressed to his lips, lies dying in the house of Etienne Fabri’s. He finds himself far from his family, among ‘quite barbarous people’ in Gascony, with only a few faithful companions at his side. That young man happens to be the King of England’s son and heir. Contemporary chroniclers refer to him either as Young Henry, Henry the Younger, the Young King or Henry III. He does not know that since he is destined to predecease his father, his name will vanish somewhere in a dim and distant… future, almost utterly lost to posterity. Ironically, it is Henry’s untimely passing-the best documented moment of his life-that he is mainly remembered for. Additionally, the actions surrounding his death serve as an invaluable source of information concerning the rituals performed at the twelfth-century deathbed. From his example we can learn a lot about medie…

A Few Facts About Henry the Young King

Henry the Young King was the only king of England crowned in his father’s lifetime. In this his father, Henry II followed the continental tradition. The Capetian rulers had their heirs crowned during their reign in order to avoid even a momentary interregnum and disorder. Louis VI, for instance, still active monarch, had his son, also Louis, anointed in Rheims cathedral already in 1131. It was not until 1137 that Louis began his independent rule and only upon his father’s death. The same Louis had his only son, Philip crowned in 1179, a year before he himself died. Today I would like to introduce a few facts about Henry the Young King everyone should know.
- Henry (b. 28 February 1155) was not meant to be a king. The crown was to be inherited by his elder brother, William (b.17 August 1153). Unfortunately, at the age of three, William became seriously ill and died, the only child of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, who failed to reach maturity. Upon his untimely passing, Henry, the s…