Fornham Revisited
‘[The
earl of Leicester] … came with his army to a place near St Edmund’s, which is known as Fornham, situated on a piece of marshy
ground, not far from the church of St Genevive. On his arrival being
known, the earl, with a considerable force, and Humphrey de Bohun
with three hundred knights, soldiers of the king, went forth armed
for battle to meet the earl of Leicester, carrying before them the
banner of St Edmund the king and martyr as their standard' (The
Annals of Roger de Hoveden, p. 375)
Bury St Edmunds. Abbey Gate, rebuilt in the 14th century. Photo courtesy of Rambling Man (wikipedia.org)
Yesterday
marked the 843rd anniversary of the Battle of Fornham, one of the
most decisive battles of Henry II's reign. I posted about the
momentous events of 17 October 1173 a few years ago, but in the light
of what Professor Strickland writes about it in his Henry the Young
King biography it is hard not to mention this severe blow to Henry
the Young King's cause yet one more time
Before
I redirect my readers to my previous post about the battle, I would
like to draw their attention to an illuminating detail I have come
across while reading the biography, at least the attention of all
those, who repeatedly and groundlessly accuse Henry the Young King of
inability and total lack of political acumen. Fascinating how Henry
the Young King and his supporters used the image of the newly
canonized St Thomas, Henry's former tutor, for propaganda purposes.
Earl Robert of Leicester, one of his chief allies, for instance,
shortly before the disastrous battle of Fornham, had a polyphonic
song, Novus miles sequitur, composed to show how St
Thomas supported the young king's cause. The song stressed Thomas'
role as a "new soldier" of "the new king","spiritual
soldier to the clergy and people" and guide of Leicester's
clerics and knights, who was to direct them "in such a way that
he [the Young King] may reign in the land, when the wars are done,
with the eternal king". It also indicated that, with God's and
St Thomas' blessing, replacing the old king with his son may herald a
new era, new beginning, which - as Thomas' death and martyrdom
"healed the wounds of a palsied world" - was going to
"renew the world". However, Earl Robert and his
companions soon learned that invoking St Thomas was of no help and
"... at Fornham it was St Edmund, king and martyr, who had
punished those who dared to ravage his lands" (Strickland, p.
177), just as he had punished King Stephen's son Eustace in 1153 for
much the same reasons, the memory of the latter's sudden death still
vivid in 1173.
St Edmund with Edward the Confessor, John the Baptist and King Richard II. The Wilton Diptych
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
‘I
have been concerned here to record what I know from personal
experience of the events that took place in St Edmund’s church in
my time, describing the bad deeds as well as the good, to provide
both warning and example. I begin in the year in which the Flemings
were taken prisoner outside the town…’ With these words
Jocelin of Brakelond begins his Chronicle
of the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds and
adds that 1173 was the year when he himself entered the monastery.
Jocelin must have known every detail of the battle that was fought at
nearby Fornham St. Genevive on 17 October 1173, the first serious
defeat of Henry the Young King’s forces on English soil in the
rebellion against his father, and probably, as John D. Hosler points
out ‘the most decisive battle’ in Henry II’s reign....
Invoking St Thomas must have outraged Henry II.
ReplyDeleteWith all probability it did, but let us not forget that not a year passed when Henry II himself was invoking the saint and in this he turned out to be more successful than Earl Robert... I mean the capture of William the Lion before the walls of Alnwick, of course.
Delete