Skip to main content

Fornham Revisited

[The earl of Leicester] … came with his army to a place near St Edmund’s, which is known as Fornham, situated on a piece of marshy ground, not far from the church of St Genevive. On his arrival being known, the earl, with a considerable force, and Humphrey de Bohun with three hundred knights, soldiers of the king, went forth armed for battle to meet the earl of Leicester, carrying before them the banner of St Edmund the king and martyr as their standard' (The Annals of Roger de Hoveden, p. 375)
              Bury St Edmunds. Abbey Gate, rebuilt in the 14th century. Photo courtesy of Rambling Man (wikipedia.org)

Yesterday marked the 843rd anniversary of the Battle of Fornham, one of the most decisive battles of Henry II's reign. I posted about the momentous events of 17 October 1173 a few years ago, but in the light of what Professor Strickland writes about it in his Henry the Young King biography it is hard not to mention this severe blow to Henry the Young King's cause yet one more time

Before I redirect my readers to my previous post about the battle, I would like to draw their attention to an illuminating detail I have come across while reading the biography, at least the attention of all those, who repeatedly and groundlessly accuse Henry the Young King of inability and total lack of political acumen. Fascinating how Henry the Young King and his supporters used the image of the newly canonized St Thomas, Henry's former tutor, for propaganda purposes. Earl Robert of Leicester, one of his chief allies, for instance, shortly before the disastrous battle of Fornham, had a polyphonic song, Novus miles sequitur, composed to show how St Thomas supported the young king's cause. The song stressed Thomas' role as a "new soldier" of "the new king","spiritual soldier to the clergy and people" and guide of Leicester's clerics and knights, who was to direct them "in such a way that he [the Young King] may reign in the land, when the wars are done, with the eternal king". It also indicated that, with God's and St Thomas' blessing, replacing the old king with his son may herald a new era, new beginning, which - as Thomas' death and martyrdom "healed the wounds of a palsied world" - was going to  "renew the world". However, Earl Robert and his companions soon learned that invoking St Thomas was of no help and "... at Fornham it was St Edmund, king and martyr, who had punished those who dared to ravage his lands" (Strickland, p. 177), just as he had punished King Stephen's son Eustace in 1153 for much the same reasons, the memory of the latter's sudden death still vivid in 1173.
                         St Edmund with Edward the Confessor, John the Baptist and King Richard II. The Wilton Diptych
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I have been concerned here to record what I know from personal experience of the events that took place in St Edmund’s church in my time, describing the bad deeds as well as the good, to provide both warning and example. I begin in the year in which the Flemings were taken prisoner outside the town…’ With these words Jocelin of Brakelond begins his Chronicle of the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds and adds that 1173 was the year when he himself entered the monastery. Jocelin must have known every detail of the battle that was fought at nearby Fornham St. Genevive on 17 October 1173, the first serious defeat of Henry the Young King’s forces on English soil in the rebellion against his father, and probably, as John D. Hosler points out ‘the most decisive battle’ in Henry II’s reign....
View original post here.

Comments

  1. Invoking St Thomas must have outraged Henry II.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With all probability it did, but let us not forget that not a year passed when Henry II himself was invoking the saint and in this he turned out to be more successful than Earl Robert... I mean the capture of William the Lion before the walls of Alnwick, of course.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

28 February 1155: In Celebration of Henry the Young King's Birthday

On the pages of his Chronicon Geoffrey, prior of Vigeois, described in meticulous detail how young Henry packed as much repentance into his deathbed as he could before he passed away.  Geoffrey left nothing unsaid. The hair shirt, bed of ashes, halter around neck, Bernard, bishop of Agen administering the last rites, and many other men of religion … all was there to ‘draw the readers attention away from the affairs of this world to those of the next’. Of course, Geoffrey, a man of religion himself, must have seen young Henry’s untimely passing as a divine punishment. But there were other voices who disagreed with that of the prior. Thomas de Agnellis, for example, in his sermon claimed that as the Young King’s sad retinue was toiling over the jolly sunbathed hills and dales of Aquitaine, it became the focus for many miracles. The rumors of the late king’s sainthood began to circulate. The monasteries pillaged by him shortly before his death- as it happened some of the most sacred shri…

The History of William Marshal on the War of 1183. Part I

The anniversary of Henry the Young King's untimely passing is fast approaching and though I have discussed the surrounding events many times here, on the blog, I have never focused solely on the version introduced by one John, the author of the History of William Marshal. If we are believe to him, this is what happened in the spring of 1183 and these are the roots of the conflict that broke out between the Angevins, the conflict in which brothers stood against each other, and sons stood against father (following the translation by Nigel Bryant):

'(...) the following Lent saw conflict between the three brothers. The Young King and his brother Count Geoffrey, lord of Brittany, angrily left their father, offended and enraged that their brother, the count of Poitiers, with their father's backing, had made so bold as to wage war on the highest nobles of that land and to treat them most unjustly. They'd complained to the Young King and declared that they would sooner serve hi…

14 June 1170. Henry’s First Coronation

On 14 June 1170, Henry II had his son Henry [since then called the Young King] crowned king of England at Westminster, with Rogerof Pont-l’Eveque, Archbishop of York performing the act instead of the exiled Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Four English bishops assisted at the ceremony. These were Hugh of Durham, Gilbert of London, Jocelyn of Salisbury and Walter of Rochester. The Norman bishops present were Henry of Bayeux and Giles of Evreux. By crowning his eldest surviving son in his own lifetime Henry II followed the continental tradition, which had worked out for French and German kings. The king wanted to avoid future disputes over the succession. The coronation enraged Thomas Becket and renewed the long-lasting dispute over primacy betweenCanterbury andYork. The Archbishop of Canterbury reminded that it was the traditional right of the archbishop ofCanterbury, and not the archbishop ofYork, to perform coronations. In his turn, Archbishop Roger evoked Pope Gregory the Gr…