Skip to main content

Matilda and Geoffrey: Henry's Paternal Grandparents

‘… on 7 September 1151, the victorious duke of the Normans, of the people of Anjou, Touraine and Maine, returning from a royal council [held in Paris by Louis VII of France], having been taken seriously ill with a fever [after he went to swim on a hot day] … collapsed on his couch. Then, looking into the future of his land and his people with the spirit of prophecy, he forbade Henry his heir to introduce the customs of Normandy or England into his own county, nor the reverse, as it might be, according to the succession of changing fortune’. This is how John of Marmoutier described Henry the Young King’s paternal grandfather, Geoffrey le Bel of Anjou’s sudden death at the Chateau-du-Loir, in the Pays de la Loire region of France. Geoffrey was only thirty-nine and did not live long enough to see his eldest son, Henry crowned king of England. He was buried in the church of St Julien at Le Mans ‘in a most noble tomb which the righteous bishop, William of pious fame, had built fittingly. Such a venerable likeness of the count was fashioned there, suitably ornamented with gold and precious stones, that it seemed to express their doom for the proud and grace to the humble. At the altar of the crucifix, at which the dead man lay, a chaplain was appointed by the bishop with a stipend in perpetuity, who each day offered the sacrifice to God for the count’s sake…’
Best known as the father of future Henry II and founder of the Plantagenet dynasty, Geoffrey had become the count of Anjou upon his father, Fulk V’s departure to the Holy Land in 1128. Shortly before he had married Matilda, dowager Empress and daughter of Henry I of England. Marrying the daughter of a king and the widow of an emperor was an excellent match for the son of a count.

The image of Geoffrey on his tomb at Le Mans

On the 17th day of June, eight days after Whitsun, in the year 1128, Henry the Young King’s future grandparents were standing in the presence of archbishops, bishops, abbots, and priests of all ranks, and listening as the solemn masses blessing their marriage were celebrated in Le Mans. Matilda was twenty-six at the time whereas her betrothed was a youth two months shy of his fifteenth birthday, newly knighted by his father-in-law, Henry I of England.
There was rejoicing amidst the clergy, dancing by the people and the shouting of praise by all and sundry, whether native or foreigner, rich, middling or poor, noble or commoner, soldier or husbandman drawn in by the general rejoicing. He who was unconcerned by the wedding festivities was doubtless deemed a traitor. Men and women spent the wedding feast taking their fill of the different dishes. For three weeks, the marriage was celebrated without a break and, when it was over, no one left without a gift.
Blessed with good looks Geoffrey was later called ‘le Bel’, a nickname he won due to being ‘tall in stature, handsome and red-headed’. He had other praiseworthy qualities as well: ‘unusually skilled at warfare… energetic soldier, shrewd in his upright dealings, exceptionally well educated, generous to all’. John of Marmoutier, Geoffrey’s first biographer claimed that the count ‘differed in no respect from the most excellent princes of his time and was loved by all, although he endured much trouble from his own men’. Perhaps the aforesaid John gave us a clue, a key to Geoffrey’s success, when he wrote that ‘being intelligent and of strong character, he did not allow himself to be corrupted by excess or sloth in early adulthood, but spent his time riding around the country and performing illustrious feats, but saying little about himself as he did so’. I daresay that in that love of illustrious feats, Henry the Young King must have resembled his grandfather. A pity they had never been given a chance to meet. Unless the posthumous meetings do count, of course. I have Henry the Young King’s speedy and utterly unplanned burial at St Julien in mind, where his body was  interred next to his grandfather’s resting place for a short time in the course of the hot and humid summer of 1183.

Good-looking or not, Geoffrey failed to impress his imperial bride. She remained cold and aloof throughout the splendid wedding celebrations of 1128 and throughout the twenty-three years of their marriage. She never ceased to despise him as her social inferior. He was her second husband. In 1114 she had been married to Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor. Henry died eleven years later and Matilda returned to England. Geoffrey and Matilda’s marriage was described as tempestuous. They disliked each other from the start. On the other hand, they both proved to be tough and ambitious, as well as shrewd politicians. They fulfilled their duty and produced the children necessary to guarantee the continuation of their lines. They had three sons: Henry (later Duke of Normandy, Count of Anjou, Maine and Touraine, King of England) in 1133, Geoffrey (future count of Nantes) in 1134, and William, count of Poitou in 1136. Like so many royal and aristocratic marriages Matilda and Geoffrey’s was an arranged match. It all started with the murder of Count Charles of Flanders on 2 march 1127. Charles died without issue and what followed was a struggle over the succession to his county. One of the candidates, who managed to obtain an advantage over his rivals, happened to be Heny I’s nephew, William Clito, son of Robert Curthose, duke of Normandy. Matilda’s father was forced to seek allies in order to avoid the direct consequences of facing a coalition of Flanders and France acting in support of William Clito. In 1118 the same coalition with help of the count of Anjou had become the greatest threat to his hold on the Anglo-Norman realm. This time Henry successfully prevented Fulk V of Anjou’s alliance with the northern French forces, promising his only daughter’s hand to Fulk’s son and heir, Geoffrey. No doubt Count Fulk had every reason to rejoice over his diplomatic success.

Matilda had been promised the succession of both, England and Normandy. But upon Henry I’s death in 1135 her cousin, Stephen of Blois, seized the throne leading to nineteen years of civil war, known today  as the Anarchy. The barons of the realm, although they had sworn allegiance to Henry I’s daughter, chose to support Stephen’s cause in the end. Mainly because Matilda was a woman- there was no precedent for the Normans to be ruled by a female- and a stranger (she had been sent to German court as a girl of eight and brought up there according to the ‘foreign’ customs). But if they thought that Matilda would come to terms with this, they were wrong. The Empress was most unwilling to give up what she considered hers by right. When she was fighting over her inheritance in England, her young husband made himself busily occupied in Normandy, the conquest of which he completed in 1144 after taking Rouen and being invested as duke. One year later, the last of Stephen’s strongholds, Arques, fell to him. In 1149 Geoffrey had turned over the duchy to his eldest son Henry.

Matilda outlived her second husband for sixteen years. She died on 10 September 1167, at the Abbaye de Notre-Dame de Prés, near Rouen and was buried at the Abbaye du Bec, the religious house she had cherished throughout her life. The monks, following their benefactress’s wish, interred her body before the altar of the Virgin Mary. According to Stephen (known as Stephen of Rouen- Fr. Etienne de Rouen), one of the monks, when she died the flower of the meadow (Fr.le pré) withered and a star fell. It was the first time when Empress Matilda was compared to a flower. Usually she was described in quite different words, such as ‘haughty, hard, inflexible and lacking feminine qualities’ and best remembered for pitching England into a disastrous civil war while trying to win back what she considered her rightful inheritance. And she might have won, had she only not alienated those whom she ought to have treated with due respect. Her chief allies, David I, king of Scotland (her maternal uncle) and Robert of Gloucester (her half-brother and the eldest of Henry I numerous illegitimate children) were influential backing in her war against Stephen, but proved not enough to overcome the main obstacle, Matilda’s own personality. Instead of trying to win as much support as possible, the Empress showed the same lack of political acumen as her enemy and cousin, king Stephen. After ‘God’s judgment was passed on’ Stephen and he was captured at the battle of Lincoln, ‘the Empress was regarded as their lady by all the English except in Kent, where the queen and William of Ypres fought against her with all their might. She was first recognized by the bishop of Winchester, the papal legate [and Stephen’s brother], and soon after by the Londoners. But she was puffed up with intolerable pride because her followers had been so successful in the uncertainties of war, and she alienated everyone from her. So, whether by conspiracy or by divine providence (for whatever men do is by the will of God) she was expelled from London’. She had levied a heavy tax from the citizens (who showed enough eagerness to support her cause) and offended nobles who could have provided arms, ipso facto turning their loyalty and willingness to cooperate into resistance. Still it is hard not to admire her iron will and determination. She was an exceptional and powerful woman in an age dominated by men. Tough and ambitious, she never deviated from her political aims. In the end, it was she who won and lived to see her beloved eldest son, Henry crowned king of England. Her epitaph in the Rouen Cathedral (to which her remains were moved from Bec) reads, “Great by birth, greater by marriage, greatest in her offspring, here lies Matilda, the daughter, wife and mother of Henry”.


For further reading I highly recommend a brilliant text devoted to Geoffrey on Elizabeth Chadwick’s wonderful blog.



Sources:

History of Duke Geoffrey by John of Marmoutier in The Plantagenet Chronicles edited by Dr. Elizabeth Hallam. Greenwich Editions, 2002.
The History of the English by Henry of Huntigdon in the Plantagenet Chronicles ed. by Elizabeth Hallam. Greenwich Editions, 2002.
Henry II by W. L. Warren. Google Books.
The Angevin Empire by John Gillingham. Edward Arnold, 1984.
Historical Dictionary of the British Monarchy by Kenneth J. Panton. Google Books.
Eleanor of Aquitaine and the Four Kings by Amy Kelly. Vintage Books, 1950.

Comments

  1. What a terrific informative post, Kasia! I really enjoyed reading it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Kathryn! I really enjoyed writing it :-) Especially the part concerning Geoffrey, for he seems to be generally a little bit neglected in comparison to his wife. I love Elizabeth Chadwick's text, the anecdotes in particular.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know a little about King Stephen, but very little about Matilda. She seems to have been a formidable woman!

    ReplyDelete
  4. She was :-) Despite her haughtiness and lack of political acumen in some situations, I can't help admiring her. I'm planning to read E. Chadwick's Lady of The English in the nearest future. I've read the excerpt on Amazon and it's brilliantly written (like all E. Chadwick's books). Thank you, Anerje for paying a visit to us :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. An excellent post, but I wonder if you have the right Matilda in your manuscript image. Everywhere I've seen that picture before, it's been supposed to be Matilda Margrave of Canossa counselling Pope Gregory VII on his treatment of King Henry IV of Germany. She was, of course, no less a formidable Matilda than the Empress. Stephen's wife Matilda also comes in high on the impressive medieval women scales. It was obviously a good name to have. Luckier, perhaps, than Henry...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you, Jonathan! I will check it- although I am quite certain you are in the right- and change it immediately :-). Matilda of Canossa was an extraordinary woman and ruler. The name itself must have had something to do with the personality, as history shows.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

28 February 1155: In Celebration of Henry the Young King's Birthday

On the pages of his Chronicon Geoffrey, prior of Vigeois, described in meticulous detail how young Henry packed as much repentance into his deathbed as he could before he passed away.  Geoffrey left nothing unsaid. The hair shirt, bed of ashes, halter around neck, Bernard, bishop of Agen administering the last rites, and many other men of religion … all was there to ‘draw the readers attention away from the affairs of this world to those of the next’. Of course, Geoffrey, a man of religion himself, must have seen young Henry’s untimely passing as a divine punishment. But there were other voices who disagreed with that of the prior. Thomas de Agnellis, for example, in his sermon claimed that as the Young King’s sad retinue was toiling over the jolly sunbathed hills and dales of Aquitaine, it became the focus for many miracles. The rumors of the late king’s sainthood began to circulate. The monasteries pillaged by him shortly before his death- as it happened some of the most sacred shri…

The History of William Marshal on the War of 1183. Part I

The anniversary of Henry the Young King's untimely passing is fast approaching and though I have discussed the surrounding events many times here, on the blog, I have never focused solely on the version introduced by one John, the author of the History of William Marshal. If we are believe to him, this is what happened in the spring of 1183 and these are the roots of the conflict that broke out between the Angevins, the conflict in which brothers stood against each other, and sons stood against father (following the translation by Nigel Bryant):

'(...) the following Lent saw conflict between the three brothers. The Young King and his brother Count Geoffrey, lord of Brittany, angrily left their father, offended and enraged that their brother, the count of Poitiers, with their father's backing, had made so bold as to wage war on the highest nobles of that land and to treat them most unjustly. They'd complained to the Young King and declared that they would sooner serve hi…

14 June 1170. Henry’s First Coronation

On 14 June 1170, Henry II had his son Henry [since then called the Young King] crowned king of England at Westminster, with Rogerof Pont-l’Eveque, Archbishop of York performing the act instead of the exiled Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Four English bishops assisted at the ceremony. These were Hugh of Durham, Gilbert of London, Jocelyn of Salisbury and Walter of Rochester. The Norman bishops present were Henry of Bayeux and Giles of Evreux. By crowning his eldest surviving son in his own lifetime Henry II followed the continental tradition, which had worked out for French and German kings. The king wanted to avoid future disputes over the succession. The coronation enraged Thomas Becket and renewed the long-lasting dispute over primacy betweenCanterbury andYork. The Archbishop of Canterbury reminded that it was the traditional right of the archbishop ofCanterbury, and not the archbishop ofYork, to perform coronations. In his turn, Archbishop Roger evoked Pope Gregory the Gr…