Skip to main content

The Victors of Verneuil

9 August 1173. The first (the second being the siege of Rouen exactly a year later) of the two most important sieges of the Great Revolt came to an end. After a month siege the key border Norman town of Verneuil surrendered do Louis VII and Henry the Young King. The event left Louis, who was in command, with a stain on his honour. Let me quote the detailed account of what had happened shortly before from the Annals of Roger of Howden:

‘… Louis, king of the Franks, and the king of England, the son laid siege to Verneuil, but Hugh de Lacy and Hugh de Beauchamp, who were the constables thereof, defended the town… boldly and with resolute spirit. In consequence of this, the king of France, after remaining there a whole month, with difficulty took a small portion of the town on the side where the engines of war had been planted.’


 However, the burgers in the Great Burgh [Verneuil, besides the castle, consisted of, according to Ralph of Diceto, seven burghs each separated from the other by a moat and walls] seeing that their food supplies and necessaries were short and insufficient made a truce for three days with the French king. According to it they could ask for Henry II’s help, but if he failed to reach the town on the appointed day, they would surrender their burgh to Louis on the vigil of Saint Laurence [‘whom he was accustomed especially and devoutly to venerate’], 9 August. Upon the agreement they gave hostages to the king of France and were promised that if they surrendered at the appointed time, their hostages would be restored to them ‘free and unmolested’. The burghers sent envoys to Henry II, but although the king, marching through Conches and destroying the rebel castle of Breteuil, managed to reach Verneuil on time, Louis violated the truce.

‘On hearing of this, the king of England collected as large an army as he possibly could from Normandy and the rest of his dominions [and] … for the purpose of engaging with the king of France, proceeded to a high hill, near Verneuil, with the whole of his army, and drew up his troops in order of battle. This too was the peremptory day upon which that portion of Verneuil was to be surrendered if it did not obtain succour. Upon this, Louis, king of the Franks, sent William, archbishop of Sens, earl Henry, and earl Theobald to the king of England, the father, who appointed an interview to be held between them on the morrow, and the king of England, to his misfortune, placed confidence in them; for he was deceived. For on the morrow the king of France neither came to the interview, nor yet sent any messenger. On this, the king of England sent out spies to observe the position of the king of France and his army; but while the spies were delying their return, that portion of Verneuil was surrendered [apparently the citizens did not know of Henry II’s arrival] to the king of France to which he had laid siege. However, he did not dare retain it in his hands, having transgressed the oath which he had made to the burghers. For he neither restored to them their hostages, nor preserved the peace as he had promised; but, entering the town, made the burghers prisoners, carried off their property, set fire to the Burgh, and then, taking to flight, carried away with him the burghers before-mentioned to France’.

It is unclear why Henry the Young King’s father-in-law acted this way. We will never know whether his stratagem was premeditated or was just a panicked response to Henry II’s unexpectedly quick arrival. Knowing Louis’s character and the ups and downs of his reign the latter explanation seems more probable. We will also never know what role the Young King played in the events. Judging by the chronicler’s words- and it was merely a mention- he did not have much to say. We must remember that he was only eighteen at the time, too young and inexperienced to be counted with. Just a puppet in the hands of his mighty allies.

Upon realizing Louis’s duplicity Henry II gave pursuit, killed many, and ravaged the French camp, taking much booty. Let me sum up yet one more time in Roger of Howden’s words:
‘In order that these events may be kept in memory, it is as well to know that this flight of the king of France took place on the fifth day of the week, upon the vigil of St Lawrence, to the praise and glory of Jesus Christ, who by punishing the crime of perfidy so speedily avenged the indignity done to his martyr’.

Sources:

The Annals of Roger de Hoveden, Vol. II translated by Henry T. Riley, Esq. London, 1853.

Henry II by W.L.Warren

War and Chivalry. The Conduct and Perception of War in England and Normandy, 1066-1217 by Matthew Strickland


Henry II: A Medieval Soldier at War, 1147-1189 by John D. Hosler

Comments

  1. Louis should have known never to cross an Anjevin with that temper....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How very true, Anerje! :-) But he was always slow to learn from his own mistakes, I daresay.

      Delete
  2. Indeed, Anerje. And his sons should not always have hooked up with those losers of French kings, then their revolts may have been more effective. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gabriele, at the time of the Great Revolt Henry's sons were too young and inexperienced to show political acumen and shrewd judgement. Young Henry was eighteen, Richard was sixteen and Geoffrey fifteen.

    ReplyDelete
  4. But their mother should have known. She sent one of those kings packing, after all. ;-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

19 December 1154. Coronation of Henry's Parents

On Sunday, 19 December 1154, Henry the Young King's parents were crowned king and queen of England at Westminster Abbey by Theobald Archbishop of Canterbury*. The chronicler Henry of Huntigdonexpressed the feelingsthat must have filled all the hearts in the ravaged by the civil war England: … Henry was crowned and consecrated with becoming pomp and splendour, amidst universal rejoicing, which many mingled with tears of joy!’ (Henry of Huntingdon p.296-97).
The then Henry fitz Empress was staying in Normandy when he learned that on 25 October king Stephen died. ‘… Theobald, archbishop of Canterbury, with many nobles, dispatched messengers in all haste to their now lord the Duke of Normandy, intreating him to come over without delay, and receive the crown of England. Hindered, however, by contrary winds and a stormy sea, as well as other circumstances, it was not till six days before Christmas that, accompanied by his wife and brothers, with a retinue of great nobles and a strong forc…

28 February 1155: In Celebration of Henry the Young King's Birthday

On the pages of his Chronicon Geoffrey, prior of Vigeois, described in meticulous detail how young Henry packed as much repentance into his deathbed as he could before he passed away.  Geoffrey left nothing unsaid. The hair shirt, bed of ashes, halter around neck, Bernard, bishop of Agen administering the last rites, and many other men of religion … all was there to ‘draw the readers attention away from the affairs of this world to those of the next’. Of course, Geoffrey, a man of religion himself, must have seen young Henry’s untimely passing as a divine punishment. But there were other voices who disagreed with that of the prior. Thomas de Agnellis, for example, in his sermon claimed that as the Young King’s sad retinue was toiling over the jolly sunbathed hills and dales of Aquitaine, it became the focus for many miracles. The rumors of the late king’s sainthood began to circulate. The monasteries pillaged by him shortly before his death- as it happened some of the most sacred shri…

1 December 1135. Death of Henry I, the Great-Grandfather of Henry the Young King.

On 1 December 1135 Henry the Young King’s paternal great-grandfather and namesake, Henry I ofEnglanddied after 35-year reign. The reign marked by legal and administrative changes that assured prosperity and peace in bothEngland andNormandy(the latter had been won by Henry from his elder brother Robert Curthose in 1106).
At the time of his death Henry was staying inNormandyat a hunting lodge at Lyons-la-ForĂȘt. As Henry of Huntigdon reports: “… he partook of some lampreys, of which he was fond, though they always disagreed with him; and though his physician recommended him to abstain, the king would not submit to his salutary advice… This repast bringing on ill humours, and violently exciting similar symptoms, caused a sudden and extreme disturbance, under which his aged frame sunk into a deathly torpor… “ (p.259-60)

The old king was known for the “great delight in his grandchildren, born of his daughter by the Count of Anjou”* and they were  probably with him in those last moments of his…